• Collecting debts - what not to do... Search for law notes: From today's Muncie Star-Press:BREAK-IN: A Muncie man was arrested Saturday afternoon, accused of dealing several thousand dollars worth of...
  • Blogging for business plans... Search for law notes: You want to start a business. You read everything you can about starting a business. You probably have read enough about needing a...
  • Starting a corporation... Search for law notes: The law require three things for starting a corporation:1. Corporate by-laws.2. Articles of Incorporation.3. An Employer Identification...
  • Best wishes to Marcia Oddi... Search for law notes: I have been remiss but Marcia Oddi of The Indiana Law Blog is ill. My best wishes go out to here. The Indiana Law Blog was the first...
  • Spatial Law and Policy Update (Augu... Search for law notes: PrivacyGoogle Street View in Germany - a non-issueSpain joins countries Probing Street ViewFacebook Location and PrivacyFacebook Enters...
  • Update on Spatial Law and Policy... Search for law notes: California has revised its proposed "Pay As You Drive" insurance regulations. A full copy of the regulations can be found here.Vector One...
  • Indiana Blog: Indiana Commercial Fo... Search for law notes: I ran across this blog in the past week and with more time I would have mentioned it earlier. The writer is John Waller from Indianapolis'...
Becky Dale points this article out on how one should act when pulled over by a police officer. In general it contains some good suggestions (particularly the parts about not giving the officer a statement to work with or letting him search your car) however, there are some sections which must be considered advisedly:
If you have a firearm or other deadly weapon in the car, tell the officer and explain where the weapon is located.
As a safety matter this is probably the safest way to act and if you are going into your glove box to get your registration be certain to tell the officer if there is a gun in it. However, be aware that if a firearm is not in plain sight in the cab of the car you are likely to be charged with having a concealed weapon. Minor facts such as your inability to reach it while it was locked away in a compartment in the right side of your extended cab with no ammunition in the vehicle (much less the firearm) are of no matter. The fact that it is far more responsible to travel with the firearm locked away is no defense either. The only defense is if you have a concealed carry permit. Remember, by not telling the officer about a weapon you are exercising your right not to incriminate yourself; you are also taking a chance that some trigger happy rookie might see a barrel sticking out from under your passenger seat as you lean over to get your registration out of the glove box. Choose your actions carefully.
Women driving alone at night should be extra-cautious when a police car has flashing lights on and the officer is signaling them to pull over. A woman has every right to continue driving in a safe manner to a well-lit area, such as a convenience store lot, a gas station or a shopping center. If the officer is in an unmarked police car or in civilian clothes, the woman should ask him to summon a marked car. If he refuses, use your cell phone to call 911. Before reaching for the phone, however, explain what you are doing; otherwise the officer may think you are going for a weapon.



Turn off the ignition. Turn on the interior lights. Thereafter, keep your hands in plain view.
I see this often suggested. If you choose to act in this manner realize that you will be technically guilty of eluding an officer and probably obstruction of justice. If the lighted area isn't a block or two away you can expect to draw at least one other car and to be subject to a felony stop (two angry officers treating you as they would someone they think has a a firearm and is desperate enough to use it). The article is wrong when it says you have a "right" to act in this manner; you must weigh the pros and cons yourself as to whether you are in a situation where you feel your safety demands that you act outside the law.



For goodness sake, if you suspect you are being pulled over by someone who is not an officer don't wait until you are pulled over to call 911. The window of your car is not going to stop a criminal from getting to you. Call while you are still driving.
If the officer says you are suspected of driving "under the influence" of alcohol, you should always agree to a blood, urine or breath test, even if you are innocent.
ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!



When you are pulled over you should not do any of the tests the officer wants you to take, you should not take the street breath test, you should not even get out of your car unless the officer ORDERS you to exit the vehicle (do not get out at a request). Heck, I've known lawyers who've handed out cards telling the officer that you fully assert your rights and to arrest you or let you go. The cards came with instructions which said that if you were pulled over to get your license and registration in hand, put the card in between them, roll the window down an inch, shove them all out to the officer. This limits the evidence the officer has for probable cause to what he has witnessed while you were driving (it also absolutely ensures that you will be arrested).



Once you are at the station you must choose whether or not to take the breath test. Technically, you are required to because you drove on a street in Virginia. However, the "civil" penalty for not taking the test is loss of your license for a year. The criminal penalty, if your blood alcohol content is above a certain level or this is a 2d+ conviction within a certain number of years, is mandatory jail time or even a felony conviction. You must choose which path you prefer.

0 comments:

Post a comment on:

Info recommended by: Law and Law blogger online Sponsored by: Law daily
  • The Cluetrain Manifesto... Search for law notes: I got to admit I have read bits and pieces and a lot about The Cluetrain Manifesto and I am still not sure how to put it all into effect...
  • Franchising - reading around... Search for law notes: Today, I found a new franchising resource: FranchiseBrief.com. I have not examined the site in any depth but it seems fairly sober in its...
  • Recent Spatial Law Links... Search for law notes: Privacy - in all it forms - continues to be a hot Spatial Law issue. An article in the Washington Post discusses how the Department of...
  • State v. Jay C. Fisher... Search for law notes: 08-14-07 A-3026-05T3Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:11-5.1, a driver involved in amotor vehicle accident that results in the death of...
  • OECD Report published... Search for law notes: Earlier this months, the OECD published its communication outlook which presents the most recent comparable data on the performance of the...
  • Dying without a Will in Indiana ver... Search for law notes: I will take Indiana. This story from the Times of London, Wills injustice: fit for Dickens?, is worth reading if only to make us...
  • Follow up on powers of attorney and... Search for law notes: Just a few passing thoughts on the previous article Powers of Attorney - uses and problems and Times of London article I was commenting on...
  • Powers of Attorney - uses and probl... Search for law notes: I sum up a power of attorney as creating an alter ego for the person making the power of attorney. Let me throw in a couple of terms here....
  • Spatial Law and Policy Update (Augu... Search for law notes: Licensing/Intellectual Property rightsPirating of Sat Nav Maps in ChinaViacom to Appeal YouTube DecisionBing Adds OpenStreetMapDoes your...
  • Spatial Law and Policy Update (Augu... Search for law notes: PrivacyPrivacy pirates: Self-regulation is a sinking ship (IT World)Facial recognition App enables next-level web-stalking (Good...
  • Recent Developments in Spatial Law... Search for law notes: Rick Crowsey, of Crowsey Incorporated, forwarded me this article from the Washington Post on the increased use of GPS devices by law...
  • Commission comments on margin squee... Search for law notes: The European Commission has issued interesting comments to the Italian telecoms regulator Agcom over its proposed guidelines for ex-ante...